Here’s an interesting article about inventing words. You can do it. There are several methods including Grammaticalization and Backformation.
I like Compounding:
manspreading: “I can’t sit on the subway because that dude is manspreading :(”
See the full article here:
What is “bruh,” “stay woke” or “throw hands”?
Find out in this hilarious list of African-American slang translated for white people on Buzzfeed.” Put your foot in it.
Strangling free speech and — its sibling open mindedness — is usually associated with conservatives. Might be time to reconsider.
Commencement speeches remind columnist George Will of several free speech controversies. “Free speech is more comprehensively and aggressively embattled now than ever before in American history, largely because of two 19th-century ideas,” he says.
Agree or disagree with him, his column in the Washington Post is a useful compendium of recent efforts to stifle free speech — usually at our institutions of “inquiry” and learning.
Authors and publishers continue to point with pride when they make the American Library Association’s list of most complained about books. It was 311 books in 2014.
The association said the complaints were about books straying from mainstream thought: “sex, drug use, homosexual themes, politics and offensive language.”
Author of the most complained about book, Sherman Alexie, said he was proud to be on the list for the fourth straight year. “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” concerns Native American cultural issues.
The fact that three graphic novels made the list shows comic books are becoming a vital part of modern culture, according to the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund.
It’s big undefined blob of a word that obscures rather than illuminates. Gentrification is a metaphor and a poorly applied one. Plenty of studiers show it does not exist as people use the term, according to author John Buntin.
“As for displacement—the most objectionable feature of gentrification—there’s actually very little evidence it happens. In fact, so-called gentrifying neighborhoods appear to experience less displacement than nongentrifying neighborhoods,” he writes.
His article is well sourced. Check it out: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/01/the_gentrification_myth_it_s_rare_and_not_as_bad_for_the_poor_as_people.html
Can’t win a political argument? Then put everyone to sleep in order to get your way. Details of the new US-EU trade agreement will be public — in 30 years. This relevant point is buried behind inscrutable acronyms, boring jargon, and trendy words such as “transparency” or “stake-holder.”
“One might be forgiven for concluding from this, and in general from the obfuscatory and often downright misleading bureaucratese in which TTIP’s aims are framed, that they are trying to hide something,” according to Steven Poole writing in the US edition of The Guardian. “However, the official TTIP literature itself relentlessly invokes the modish political virtue of “transparency”.
See the full clever and informative article here: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/nov/21/steven-poole-language-power-disarm-concerned-citizen
Let’s have some fun. What your girl friend really means:
Is it Ok to put the word “illegal” in the name of your restaurant such as Illegal Pete’s opening next month in Fort Collins, CO? If you know Illegal Pete’s is a Mexican restaurant, is it still OK?
Many community members are answering “No.” The discussion joins a controversy that has been running for several years, according to Lawrence Downes, who wrote a 2007 commentary in the New York Times, which explains it well.
“”Since the word modifies not the crime but the whole person, it goes too far,” Downes wrote.” It spreads, like a stain that cannot wash out. It leaves its target diminished as a human, a lifetime member of a presumptive criminal class.”
There’s an insightful discussion at The Coloradoan: http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/local/2014/10/27/language-expert-dissects-illegal-illegal-petes/18011229/
Robert Darnton offers a useful reminder that not all societies are as dedicated to free speech as the US. In fact, some intellectuals have seen censorship as a valuable way to form and maintain civil society.
Darton’s new book Censors at Work: How States Shaped Literature (published by W. W. Norton) examines censorship in three societies. Revolutionary France, imperial India, and East Germany.
His detailed examples give use second thought on the value of censorship. Some censors have acted more like editors, enhancing the author’s work. Some not.
His blog is worth a read: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/sep/17/what-is-censorship/